Supreme Court agrees to hear oil and gas companies' challenge to climate lawsuits seeking billions in damages, potentially reshaping how states can hold fossil fuel industry liable for climate change impacts.
The Supreme Court agreed Monday to hear appeals from oil and gas companies seeking to block state lawsuits that hold them liable for billions in climate change damages. The case centers on Boulder, Colorado's lawsuit against Suncor Energy and ExxonMobil, part of a wave of climate litigation in states including California, Hawaii, and New Jersey.
At issue is whether these cases belong in state or federal courts. The companies argue emissions are a national issue requiring federal jurisdiction, where similar suits have been dismissed. Trump's Justice Department supported the companies, warning that allowing state courts to proceed means 'every locality in the country could sue essentially anyone in the world for contributing to global climate change.' Trump has criticized these lawsuits in an executive order.
Boulder's attorneys counter that states have long addressed in-state harms from out-of-state conduct, comparing it to cases involving defective automobiles or asbestos. The lawsuits seek damages to help pay for rebuilding after wildfires, rising sea levels, and severe storms that governments say were worsened by climate change.
Editor’s rationale — Supreme Court decision to hear oil-and-gas liability case carries high institutional impact potential, affecting billions in damages, nationwide litigation framework, and climate accountability doctrine; multi-state scope with long-term precedential relevance; primary institutional action confirmed by AP with official statements, though the decision to hear (not decide) limits immediate novelty.