Twenty-five states challenge Trump's new forced-labor tariffs on 60 countries covering 99% of US imports, calling them illegal pretext to replace Supreme Court-struck tariffs.
Twenty-five states filed suit Monday against the Trump administration over new tariffs on 60 countries covering 99% of US imports. The tariffs, ranging from 10% to 12.5%, were imposed last month under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, with the administration citing failures to combat forced labor in supply chains. New York Attorney General Letitia James called the move "an illegal attempt to raise taxes on families and businesses" after the Supreme Court struck down previous tariffs.
The lawsuit argues the tariffs are a pretext to replace import taxes invalidated by the Supreme Court in February. That ruling found President Trump lacked authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose worldwide tariffs based on trade deficits. The administration had turned to temporary 10% tariffs after that defeat, but those expired July 24. White House spokesman Kush Desai defended the new approach, saying Section 301 provides "lawful authority" and has proven legally durable since Trump's first term.
The challenge joins two earlier lawsuits from small businesses arguing the government failed to adequately establish its case against each economy or explain how tariffs would eliminate forced labor practices. Legal experts note that while Section 301 has survived court challenges before—notably on China tariffs—the nearly identical nature of three successive tariff schemes could complicate the administration's defense. The coalition suing includes Democratic-led states from New York to California, plus Kentucky and Pennsylvania.
Editor’s rationale — Multi-state lawsuit challenges executive tariff authority following Supreme Court precedent, affecting nationwide trade policy and consumer pricing. Strong institutional relevance due to separation-of-powers implications and precedent-setting potential. Broad geographic coalition (25 states) signals major scope. Primary source verification through official statements and court filings, though limited novelty as this represents reaction to previously announced tariffs rather than new disclosure.