UPDATE: Hamas agrees to framework for disarming in Gaza under Trump-brokered plan, though significant uncertainties and implementation hurdles remain with Israeli skepticism and long timelines for weapon surrender.
Hamas has accepted a framework to disarm in Gaza under the Trump administration's Board of Peace plan, marking what could be the first credible step toward ending nearly three years of conflict. The plan calls for inventorying and storing Hamas's remaining heavy weapons under Palestinian supervision rather than direct handover to Israel. The decision follows leadership elections that brought Gaza-based leader Khalil al-Hayya to head the movement, with Palestinian officials believing the new leadership was prepared to make what they describe as the most consequential political decision in Hamas's history.
The agreement faces major implementation challenges and long timelines. U.S. and Board of Peace officials said the Gaza police force would turn over weapons to a technocratic administration in the next two weeks, but this excludes the vast majority of Hamas militants and heavy weaponry. The surrender of heavy weapons and decommissioning of tunnels could take between 200 and 350 days, according to officials. Israel has not formally responded but remains deeply skeptical about Hamas's willingness to fully disarm or relinquish control of Gaza.
President Trump announced the deal on Truth Social, calling it a major milestone in his 20-point plan. Israeli media reported that Israel opposes the proposed terms, with an unnamed Israeli official stating the disarmament proposal doesn't meet Jerusalem's demands. The plan envisions Israeli forces withdrawing from Gaza, deployment of an international security force, arrival of a new Palestinian government, and reconstruction of the territory. In Gaza itself, the announcement was met with little public enthusiasm, with many Palestinians expressing deep skepticism after years of failed agreements and collapsed ceasefires.
Editor’s rationale — Hamas's acceptance of a disarmament framework represents material operational change to a multi-year conflict affecting millions, with Trump administration backing, but heavy reliance on conditional language ('if it holds,' 'remains too early to judge') and limited primary source confirmation beyond a single BBC-attributed senior Hamas official statement reduce institutional certainty and verification strength.