UPDATE: Hamas agrees to begin disarming in phases contingent on Israeli withdrawal and Palestinian statehood, marking potential breakthrough but facing major implementation obstacles including Israeli silence and upcoming elections.
Hamas announced Friday it will begin disarming under a plan unveiled by President Trump, marking the first time the militant group has agreed to lay down its weapons. The roadmap calls for Hamas to hand over police weapons to a Palestinian technocratic committee, with heavy weapons to be inventoried and stored as Israel gradually withdraws from Gaza. The process would be overseen by an International Stabilization Force, with implementation contingent on verified Israeli compliance with ceasefire terms.
Israel has not officially commented on the deal, and expectations for implementation remain low. Hamas made its agreement conditional on the creation of a Palestinian state and Israel ending all strikes and withdrawing forces—something Prime Minister Netanyahu's government adamantly opposes. The BBC reports Netanyahu faces political pressure ahead of October elections, with far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir calling the plan "not acceptable." Implementation timelines call for developing detailed schedules within 14 days, though progress could be extended by an International Verification Committee.
The agreement represents a potential breakthrough in ending the Gaza war that has killed over 70,000 Palestinians according to Hamas-run health authorities. However, the deal faces significant hurdles including zero trust between parties, Netanyahu's reelection battle, and Hamas's identity as an armed resistance movement. According to the AP, Israeli officials insist there will be no withdrawal from the 60% of Gaza they currently control until Hamas fully disarms. The proposal also calls for Hamas to hand over governance to the National Committee for the Administration of Gaza, though that body has not yet entered the territory.
Editor’s rationale — Historic peace agreement with major institutional consequences (Israeli withdrawal, Hamas disarmament, Palestinian governance restructuring) affecting millions across Middle East and U.S. foreign policy; strong multi-source confirmation but article is primarily document republication rather than investigative disclosure; durability is high given long-term regional implications but verification hinged on partial confirmations (Hamas agreed via AP, Israel silent).